[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140502050523.GA21708@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 1 May 2014 22:05:23 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>,
Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaohua Li <shli@...nel.org>,
Nicholas Bellinger <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/2] percpu_ida: Take into account CPU topology when
stealing tags
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 08:19:39PM -0600, Jens Axboe wrote:
> I've taken the consequence of this and implemented another tagging
> scheme that blk-mq will use if it deems that percpu_ida isn't going
> to be effective for the device being initialized. But I really hate
> to have both of them in there. Unfortunately I have no devices
> available that have a tag space that will justify using percu_ida,
> so comparisons are a bit hard at the moment. NVMe should change
> that, though, so decision will have to be deferred until that is
> tested.
At least for SCSI devices _tag space_ is plenty, it's just the we
artifically limit our tag space to the queue depth to avoid having to
track that one separately. In addition we also preallocaste a request
for each tag, so even if we would track the queue depth separately
we would waste a lot of memory.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists