linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 02 May 2014 07:41:29 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
To:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
	george.mccollister@...il.com, ktkhai@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work

On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 07:32 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote: 
> On Fri, 2014-05-02 at 00:42 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote: 
> > Currently sync wakeups from the wake_affine code cannot work as
> > designed, because the task doing the sync wakeup from the target
> > cpu will block its wakee from selecting that cpu.
> > 
> > This is despite the fact that whether or not the wakeup is sync
> > determines whether or not we want to do an affine wakeup...
> 
> If the sync hint really did mean we ARE going to schedule RSN, waking
> local would be a good thing.  It is all too often a big fat lie.

BTW, we used to have avg_overlap and a sync less heuristic to improve
the accuracy of the sync wakeup hint, but I ripped it out because it was
dead wrong far too often.  You can try reviving it, but preemption among
other things break it.  You'll have better luck with a simple context
switch rate heuristic, but that's less than perfect too.

-Mike

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/