[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140502055127.GH18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 06:51:27 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@...redi.hu>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: dcache shrink list corruption?
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 11:15:15AM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 07:56:13PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2014 at 7:31 PM, Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> > >
> > > OK, aggregate diff follows, more readable splitup (3 commits) attached.
> > > It seems to survive beating here; testing, review and comments are
> > > welcome.
> >
> > Miklos, did you have some particular load that triggered this, or was
> > it just some reports? It would be really good to get this patch some
> > stress-testing.
> >
> > I like how the patch removes more lines than it adds, but apart from
> > that it's hard to read the patch (even the split-out ones) and say
> > anything more about it. I think this needs a *lot* of testing.
>
> IBM is triggering this with the host01 test from the LTP suite. I haven't yet
> tried to reproduce it.
Could you repost their report? So far I hadn't managed to get actual list
corruption on mainline kernel - it definitely is possible, but on all
testcases so far the race window is too narrow. So if they have a reproducer
that doesn't take an insane amount of time, I'd really like to see it...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists