[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405021337390.22556@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 13:46:27 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 12:43:17PM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> > On Fri, 2 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >
> > > In principle the vfs file refcounting should be responsible for that.
> > > But I'll go over it in a bit.
> >
> > The poll code is ancient and the C-parser in my head really can't handle
> > it very well.
>
> Yeah, that code isn't my favourite part either..
>
> > Anyway for completeness this is the kind of thing I'm seeing.
> > The poll() manpage isn't very clear about what is supposed to happen if
> > you poll() on a closed file descriptor.
>
> POLLNVAL
> Invalid request: fd not open (output only).
>
> Seems applicable..
You're right and it seems to return that properly, so having poll be
active might just be a weird co-incidence.
> Also, could you send your entire diff this way so we're more or less
> staring at the same code again?
that last test I ran was just 3.15-rc1 plus the last patch you sent,
plus a patch to allow -pg on the event.c file, plus an unrelated one that
works around the current make-kpkg debian breakage.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists