linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/4] of/clk: Register clocks suitable for Runtime PM with the PM core

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPDyKFpTwPDu9afhOjhhQ2PKGFB+hWsp=mcaYTq8OvuGF7yT3Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 2 May 2014 10:56:23 +0200
From:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>
To:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
Cc:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 3/4] of/clk: Register clocks suitable for Runtime PM
 with the PM core

 Hi Geert,

Some more review comments.

> +
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME
> +
> +static int of_clk_pm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       int ret;
> +
> +       ret = pm_generic_runtime_suspend(dev);
> +       if (ret)
> +               return ret;
> +
> +       ret = pm_clk_suspend(dev);

What about slow clocks? Those aren't handled with pm_clk_suspend().

> +       if (ret) {
> +               pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
> +               return ret;
> +       }
> +
> +       return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int of_clk_pm_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +       pm_clk_resume(dev);

What about slow clocks? Those aren't handled with pm_clk_resume().

> +       return pm_generic_runtime_resume(dev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct dev_pm_domain of_clk_pm_domain = {
> +       .ops = {
> +               .runtime_suspend = of_clk_pm_runtime_suspend,
> +               .runtime_resume = of_clk_pm_runtime_resume,

Drivers/subsystems may invoke pm_runtime_force_suspend|resume() from
some of their system PM callbacks, which requires the runtime PM
callbacks to be defined for CONFIG_PM instead of CONFIG_PM_RUNTIME, I
believe that should be changed here as well.

> +               USE_PLATFORM_PM_SLEEP_OPS

What about other buses beside the platfrom bus. Certainly we need to
handle devices attached to any other subsystem type as well.

Kind regards
Ulf Hansson
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/