[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140502090831.GB9178@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 11:08:31 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@...dl.org>,
John Kacur <jkacur@...hat.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RT 2/2] rtmutex: Remove duplicate rt_mutex_init()
* Steven Rostedt | 2014-04-08 22:47:02 [-0400]:
>From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
>The rt_mutex_init() macro is the same whether or not
>CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEX is set. Remove the duplicate.
>
>Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
This does not apply cleanly on v3.14-rt
>--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h
>+++ b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
>@@ -62,25 +62,19 @@ struct hrtimer_sleeper;
> # define __DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \
> , .name = #mutexname, .file = __FILE__, .line = __LINE__
>
>-# define rt_mutex_init(mutex) \
>- do { \
>- raw_spin_lock_init(&(mutex)->wait_lock); \
>- __rt_mutex_init(mutex, #mutex); \
>- } while (0)
>-
The macro is the same in CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES and the else path.
Shouldn't you remove both and define it before the ifdef? There are some
users of this:
|drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: rt_mutex_init(&adap->bus_lock);
|drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c: rt_mutex_init(&dev->i2c_bus_lock);
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists