[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <AD08F6C5-1BAD-455B-9A09-1FFB8D2CA42E@linuxhacker.ru>
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 21:20:06 -0400
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging/lustre: Replace jobid acquiring with per node setting
On May 3, 2014, at 7:29 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2014 at 10:21:52PM -0400, Oleg Drokin wrote:
>> Insted of meddling directly in process environment variables
>> (which is also not possible on certain platforms due to not exported
>> symbols), create jobid_name proc file to represent this info
>> (to be filled by job scheduler epilogue).
> That looks better, but what are you going to do about getting rid of all
> of these proc files? Just move them all at once? I really don't like
> the idea of adding new ones, and want a plan for what you all are going
> to do here moving forward.
What proc files are to referring to, if I may ask?
I don't think I saw complaints about proc files, the complaints I saw were mostly about
reading env variables directly and the like so that was the focus of this patch.
Did I miss some side discussion? Any pointers?
Thanks!
Bye,
Oleg--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists