[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 12:00:44 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Does this one work better? Making sure all __perf_remove_from_context()
> callers pass the right structure seems to improve things no end. My
> machine is now happy to reboot again.
Yes, I've been fuzzing this for a few hours on both my haswell and core2
test systems and it's doing great, also survived a reboot cycle.
Tested-by: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
(Although often things like to crash the instant my tested-by e-mails
clear the lkml list.)
I also want to say thanks for all the work everyone has done in getting
this analyzed and fixed.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists