lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 14:42:31 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2) On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: > Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than > "printk_once_deferred"? Think so. It's (((printk(deferred(once))), > not (((printk(once(deferred))). > I agree with the above, but other than that you can add my: Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> also, perhaps this series should include my patch: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/336 -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists