linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 05 May 2014 13:25:00 -0700
From:	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
CC:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Jiri Bohac <jbohac@...e.cz>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Convert timekeeping core to use printk_deferred (v2)

On 05/05/2014 11:42 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Fri, 2 May 2014 16:05:36 -0700
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
>  
>> Would "printk_deferred_once" be more logical than
>> "printk_once_deferred"?  Think so.  It's (((printk(deferred(once))),
>> not (((printk(once(deferred))).
>>
> I agree with the above, but other than that you can add my:
>
> Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Thanks, will do!

>
> also, perhaps this series should include my patch:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/3/25/336

So this set applies ontop of -mm, which I believe includes your change.

If I try to cherry-pick your patch to include in my set, I think I have
to cherry-pick Jan's changes as well, so its probably just easier for
folks to grab -mm. :)
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/