linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] slab: Fix off by one in object max number tests.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20140505.232550.1139149215179650645.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 05 May 2014 23:25:50 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	sam@...nborg.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com,
	sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, hannes@...xchg.org, cl@...ux.com,
	penberg@...nel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] slab: Fix off by one in object max number tests.

From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 17:08:55 -0400 (EDT)

> From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 23:05:07 +0200
> 
>> On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 04:57:56PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>>> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>> Date: Mon, 05 May 2014 16:20:04 -0400 (EDT)
>>> 
>>> > 
>>> > If freelist_idx_t is a byte, SLAB_OBJ_MAX_NUM should be 255 not 256,
>>> > and likewise if freelist_idx_t is a short, then it should be 65535 not
>>> > 65536.
>>> > 
>>> > Fixes: a41adfa ("slab: introduce byte sized index for the freelist of a slab")
>>> > Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
>>> > ---
>>> > 
>>> > This was leading to all kinds of random crashes on sparc64 where PAGE_SIZE
>>> > is 8192.  One problem shown was that if spinlock debugging was enabled,
>>> > we'd get deadlocks in copy_pte_range() or do_wp_page() with the same cpu
>>> > already holding a lock it shouldn't hold, or the lock belonging to a
>>> > completely unrelated process.
>>> 
>>> It turns out that after some more testing, I'm still getting spinlock
>>> debugging problems with this fix applied.
>>> 
>>> The change is still very much correct I think, however.
>> 
>> There is a related patch in this area which I think is not yet applied.
>> 
>> See: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/18/28
>> 
>> Maybe this is realted.
> 
> Thanks, I'm testing with that patch added as well.

I can confirm that this fixes my problems completely.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/