[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.10.1405060041140.1436@vincent-weaver-1.umelst.maine.edu>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 00:51:33 -0400 (EDT)
From: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
cc: Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [perf] more perf_fuzzer memory corruption
On Mon, 5 May 2014, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> I'm also thinking about waiting a bit before applying anything even
> borderline intrusive to the perf core, to make sure there's enough
> fuzz time to declare stable state (at least as far into the ABI as the
> fuzzing is able to reach). Future bisection efforts could use that
> kind of known-stable release.
That does sound like a good idea. It is nice finally getting to the state
where you can fuzz for hours (rather than minutes) without hitting a bug.
Of course that might change. Development of the fuzzer has more or less
stalled for the past 6 months as I was spending all of my time
reporting/chasing bugs rather than enhancing the fuzzer.
In any case if we can get the recent patches applied in time for 3.15 I
think it will turn out to be a nice release perf-event-stability wise.
Vince
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists