linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-id: <0fa001cf68e7$e7c4c440$b74e4cc0$@samsung.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 May 2014 13:59:05 +0900
From:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
To:	'Alexandre Courbot' <gnurou@...il.com>,
	'Jingoo Han' <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	'Ben Dooks' <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	'Thierry Reding' <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	'Alexandre Courbot' <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	'Bryan Wu' <cooloney@...il.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
	'Linux Kernel Mailing List' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:
> >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
> >>> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
> >>> gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks!
> >>
> >> OK, I see. It looks good.
> >>
> >> As far as I know, 'enable_gpio_flags' has not been being used
> >> for Samsung platform. So, there will be no side effect,
> >> if 'enable_gpio_flags' is removed from 'arch/arm/plat-samsung'
> >> directory.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> >
> > Great, thanks. Ben, Kukjin, could we have your Acked-by?
> >
> > Thierry, if the Samsung maintainers are ok with it, and 2/2 of this
> > series is also ok for you (you merged the same for simple-panel
> > already), can you take both into your tree?
> 
> Last call - could we have a Acked-by from Ben or Kukjin and merge this
> through Thierry's tree? Otherwise I will just have to drop this
> series, which would be sad.

Very sorry for late response. I missed... :(

Looks good to me, so please go ahead with my ack.

Thanks,
Kukjin

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/