Date:	Tue, 6 May 2014 11:45:57 +0200
From:	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>, pmladek@...e.cz,
	Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: Remove separate printk_sched buffers and use
 printk buf instead

On Mon 05-05-14 19:18:46, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> To prevent deadlocks with doing a printk inside the scheduler,
> printk_sched() was created. The issue is that printk has a console_sem
> that it can grab and release. The release does a wake up if there's a
> task pending on the sem, and this wake up grabs the rq locks that is
> held in the scheduler. This leads to a possible deadlock if the wake up
> uses the same rq as the one with the rq lock held already.
> 
> What printk_sched() does is to save the printk write in a per cpu buffer
> and sets the PRINTK_PENDING_SCHED flag. On a timer tick, if this flag is
> set, the printk() is done against the buffer.
> 
> There's a couple of issues with this approach.
> 
> 1) If two printk_sched()s are called before the tick, the second one
> will overwrite the first one.
> 
> 2) The temporary buffer is 512 bytes and is per cpu. This is a quite a
> bit of space wasted for something that is seldom used.
> 
> In order to remove this, the printk_sched() can use the printk buffer
> instead, and delay the console_trylock()/console_unlock() to the queued
> work.
> 
> Because printk_sched() would then be taking the logbuf_lock, the
> logbuf_lock must not be held while doing anything that may call into the
> scheduler functions, which includes wake ups. Unfortunately, printk()
> also has a console_sem that it uses, and on release, the
> up(&console_sem) may do a wake up of any pending waiters. This must be
> avoided while holding the logbuf_lock.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
  Andrew already has this patch in -mm tree AFAIK...

								Honza

> ---
> This version has been forward ported to the 3.15-rc releases.
> ---
>  kernel/printk/printk.c |   87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
>  1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
> 
> Index: linux-trace.git/kernel/printk/printk.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-trace.git.orig/kernel/printk/printk.c	2014-05-05 16:46:17.280815365 -0400
> +++ linux-trace.git/kernel/printk/printk.c	2014-05-05 16:52:23.398378897 -0400
> @@ -208,6 +208,9 @@
>  /*
>   * The logbuf_lock protects kmsg buffer, indices, counters. It is also
>   * used in interesting ways to provide interlocking in console_unlock();
> + * This can be taken within the scheduler's rq lock. It must be released
> + * before calling console_unlock() or anything else that might wake up
> + * a process.
>   */
>  static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(logbuf_lock);
>  
> @@ -1338,27 +1341,43 @@
>   * interrupts disabled. It should return with 'lockbuf_lock'
>   * released but interrupts still disabled.
>   */
> -static int console_trylock_for_printk(unsigned int cpu)
> +static int console_trylock_for_printk(unsigned int cpu, bool in_sched)
>  	__releases(&logbuf_lock)
>  {
>  	int retval = 0, wake = 0;
>  
> -	if (console_trylock()) {
> -		retval = 1;
> +	/* if called from the scheduler, we can not call up() */
> +	if (in_sched)
> +		goto out;
>  
> -		/*
> -		 * If we can't use the console, we need to release
> -		 * the console semaphore by hand to avoid flushing
> -		 * the buffer. We need to hold the console semaphore
> -		 * in order to do this test safely.
> -		 */
> -		if (!can_use_console(cpu)) {
> -			console_locked = 0;
> -			wake = 1;
> -			retval = 0;
> -		}
> +	if (down_trylock(&console_sem))
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If we can't use the console, we need to release
> +	 * the console semaphore by hand to avoid flushing
> +	 * the buffer. We need to hold the console semaphore
> +	 * in order to do this test safely.
> +	 */
> +	if (console_suspended || !can_use_console(cpu)) {
> +		wake = 1;
> +		goto out;
>  	}
> +
> +	/* console is now locked */
> +
> +	console_locked = 1;
> +	console_may_schedule = 0;
> +	mutex_acquire(&console_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _RET_IP_);
> +
> +	retval = 1;
> +
> +out:
>  	logbuf_cpu = UINT_MAX;
> +	/*
> +	 * The logbuf_lock must not be held when doing a wake up,
> +	 * which the up(&console_sem) can do.
> +	 */
>  	raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock);
>  	if (wake)
>  		up(&console_sem);
> @@ -1490,11 +1509,17 @@
>  	static int recursion_bug;
>  	static char textbuf[LOG_LINE_MAX];
>  	char *text = textbuf;
> -	size_t text_len;
> +	size_t text_len = 0;
>  	enum log_flags lflags = 0;
>  	unsigned long flags;
>  	int this_cpu;
>  	int printed_len = 0;
> +	bool in_sched = false;
> +
> +	if (level == -2) {
> +		level = -1;
> +		in_sched = true;
> +	}
>  
>  	boot_delay_msec(level);
>  	printk_delay();
> @@ -1540,7 +1565,12 @@
>  	 * The printf needs to come first; we need the syslog
>  	 * prefix which might be passed-in as a parameter.
>  	 */
> -	text_len = vscnprintf(text, sizeof(textbuf), fmt, args);
> +	if (in_sched)
> +		text_len = scnprintf(text, sizeof(textbuf),
> +				     KERN_WARNING "[sched_delayed] ");
> +
> +	text_len += vscnprintf(text + text_len,
> +			       sizeof(textbuf) - text_len, fmt, args);
>  
>  	/* mark and strip a trailing newline */
>  	if (text_len && text[text_len-1] == '\n') {
> @@ -1621,7 +1651,7 @@
>  	 * The console_trylock_for_printk() function will release 'logbuf_lock'
>  	 * regardless of whether it actually gets the console semaphore or not.
>  	 */
> -	if (console_trylock_for_printk(this_cpu))
> +	if (console_trylock_for_printk(this_cpu, in_sched))
>  		console_unlock();
>  
>  	lockdep_on();
> @@ -2440,18 +2470,20 @@
>  #define PRINTK_BUF_SIZE		512
>  
>  #define PRINTK_PENDING_WAKEUP	0x01
> -#define PRINTK_PENDING_SCHED	0x02
> +#define PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT	0x02
>  
>  static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, printk_pending);
> -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(char [PRINTK_BUF_SIZE], printk_sched_buf);
>  
>  static void wake_up_klogd_work_func(struct irq_work *irq_work)
>  {
>  	int pending = __this_cpu_xchg(printk_pending, 0);
>  
> -	if (pending & PRINTK_PENDING_SCHED) {
> -		char *buf = __get_cpu_var(printk_sched_buf);
> -		pr_warn("[sched_delayed] %s", buf);
> +	if (pending & PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT) {
> +		if (console_trylock())
> +			console_unlock();
> +		else
> +			/* Try again later */
> +			__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
>  	}
>  
>  	if (pending & PRINTK_PENDING_WAKEUP)
> @@ -2475,21 +2507,14 @@
>  
>  int printk_sched(const char *fmt, ...)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
>  	va_list args;
> -	char *buf;
>  	int r;
>  
> -	local_irq_save(flags);
> -	buf = __get_cpu_var(printk_sched_buf);
> -
>  	va_start(args, fmt);
> -	r = vsnprintf(buf, PRINTK_BUF_SIZE, fmt, args);
> +	r = vprintk_emit(0, -2, NULL, 0, fmt, args);
>  	va_end(args);
>  
> -	__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_SCHED);
> -	irq_work_queue(&__get_cpu_var(wake_up_klogd_work));
> -	local_irq_restore(flags);
> +	__this_cpu_or(printk_pending, PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT);
>  
>  	return r;
>  }
-- 
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists