lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 15:26:50 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, umgwanakikbuti@...il.com,
Preeti Murthy <preeti.lkml@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, george.mccollister@...il.com,
ktkhai@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 10:20:20AM +0530, Preeti U Murthy wrote:
> Don't you think we should go conservative on the value of
> RECLAIM_DISTANCE in arch specific code at-least? On powerpc we set it to
> 10. Besides, the git log does not tell us the basis on which this value
> was set to a default of 30. Maybe this needs re-thought?
See my last email on how all this is entirely pointless :-(
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists