lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 6 May 2014 17:17:39 +0200
From:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
	"linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: SAMSUNG: remove gpio flags in dev-backlight

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 11:33:00PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com> wrote:
> > Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 11:14 PM, Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 6:51 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:
> >> >> On Thursday, April 10, 2014 1:17 PM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>> Ping, can I have the Samsung folks review and ,aybe even merge this
> >> >>> patch? enable_gpio_flags is never used in any code, is replaced by
> >> >>> gpiod, and we would like to remove it altogether from pwm_bl. Thanks!
> >> >>
> >> >> OK, I see. It looks good.
> >> >>
> >> >> As far as I know, 'enable_gpio_flags' has not been being used
> >> >> for Samsung platform. So, there will be no side effect,
> >> >> if 'enable_gpio_flags' is removed from 'arch/arm/plat-samsung'
> >> >> directory.
> >> >>
> >> >> Reviewed-by: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
> >> >
> >> > Great, thanks. Ben, Kukjin, could we have your Acked-by?
> >> >
> >> > Thierry, if the Samsung maintainers are ok with it, and 2/2 of this
> >> > series is also ok for you (you merged the same for simple-panel
> >> > already), can you take both into your tree?
> >>
> >> Last call - could we have a Acked-by from Ben or Kukjin and merge this
> >> through Thierry's tree? Otherwise I will just have to drop this
> >> series, which would be sad.
> >
> > Very sorry for late response. I missed... :(
> >
> > Looks good to me, so please go ahead with my ack.
> 
> Thanks Kukjin!
> 
> Thierry, do you want me to rebase and resend these (now old) patches?
> I haven't heard anything from you about them yet.

No, that's fine. I can handle them.

Thanks,
Thierry

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ