linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: defconfigs: add MTD_SPI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 6 May 2014 10:05:26 -0700
From:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	"linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Sascha Hauer <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] ARM: defconfigs: add MTD_SPI_NOR (new dependency for
 M25P80)

On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 11:53:22AM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Sun, May 4, 2014 at 10:42 AM, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net> wrote:
> > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 03:51:11PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:
> >> Cases like these are easiest that we just take the patch directly in
> >> an early-merge branch (i.e. cleanup or fixes-non-critical, or a
> >> generic depends branch), and if there's conflicts as topics are merged
> >> in from subplatforms we can deal with it then.
> >
> > Are you referring to basing on -rc1, or the series being split up to
> > the individual sub-arch maintainers?
> >
> > *slightly* confused,
> 
> I'm referring to us taking the patch into something like our cleanup
> branch, and any branches that come in from you or other subplatforms
> will be merged on top, so we can resolve conflicts there and then.
> We'll merge in the cleanup branch into other next/* branches as needed
> to resolve the conflicts in our tree instead of percolating them all
> the way up.

In case you didn't notice, I already had split up the patch series a
little more for v2 (based on -rc1 still), and most of it seems to be
going through the sub-arch trees, I think. There is one patch targeted
directly at arm-soc (that's you, Olof?).

Let me know if v2 has any problems.

Thanks,
Brian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/