lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 6 May 2014 19:31:36 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>, tkhai@...dex.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kmod: Pass usermodehelper "-b" to use blacklist
	commands

On 05/06, Kirill Tkhai wrote:
>
> User may want to prohibit autoloading of some modules,
> which happens when someone in kernel calls request_module().
>
> For comparison, udev considers blacklist even if corresponding
> hardware presents in the system. In-kernel request_module()
> functionality is rather similar to udev's, so user may want
> to disallow it too.

Personally, I am always nervous (perhaps too much) when it comes to the
user-visible changes like this.

And if a user/distro wants "-b" it can create a simple script which just
execs /sbin/modprobe with "-b" and overwrite /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe.

OTOH. What if /proc/sys/kernel/modprobe points to a binary which is not
/sbin/modprobe and doesn't expect "-b" ? This can break things.

I am not really arguing, but someone should ack this change ;)


As for correctness:

Reviewed-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>



> Signed-off-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@...allels.com>
> ---
>  kernel/kmod.c | 11 ++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
> index 0ac67a5..68a4ca4 100644
> --- a/kernel/kmod.c
> +++ b/kernel/kmod.c
> @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ char modprobe_path[KMOD_PATH_LEN] = "/sbin/modprobe";
>
>  static void free_modprobe_argv(struct subprocess_info *info)
>  {
> -	kfree(info->argv[3]); /* check call_modprobe() */
> +	kfree(info->argv[4]); /* check call_modprobe() */
>  	kfree(info->argv);
>  }
>
> @@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ static int call_modprobe(char *module_name, int wait)
>  		NULL
>  	};
>
> -	char **argv = kmalloc(sizeof(char *[5]), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	char **argv = kmalloc(sizeof(char *[6]), GFP_KERNEL);
>  	if (!argv)
>  		goto out;
>
> @@ -95,9 +95,10 @@ static int call_modprobe(char *module_name, int wait)
>
>  	argv[0] = modprobe_path;
>  	argv[1] = "-q";
> -	argv[2] = "--";
> -	argv[3] = module_name;	/* check free_modprobe_argv() */
> -	argv[4] = NULL;
> +	argv[2] = "-b";
> +	argv[3] = "--";
> +	argv[4] = module_name;	/* check free_modprobe_argv() */
> +	argv[5] = NULL;
>
>  	info = call_usermodehelper_setup(modprobe_path, argv, envp, GFP_KERNEL,
>  					 NULL, free_modprobe_argv, NULL);
>
>

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ