[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFrcx1n923=fw6L=OnrDbRhWc9WGTc-FWRFeDCVtnJjKaPwyDw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 19:41:55 +0200
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Corey Ashford <cjashfor@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] perf tools: Add libdw DWARF post unwind support for ARM64
Hi Will,
On 6 May 2014 19:00, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> wrote:
> Hi Jean,
>
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:55:33PM +0100, Jean Pihet wrote:
>> Adding libdw DWARF post unwind support, which is part
>> of elfutils-devel/libdw-dev package from version 0.158.
>>
>> Note: the libdw code needs some support for dwarf unwinding
>> on ARM64, this code is submitted seperately on the elfutils
>> ML.
>>
>> The new code is contained in unwin-libdw.c object, and
>> implements unwind__get_entries unwind interface function.
>
> Are you planning to implement support for 32-bit ARM too? If so, we'll need
> compat handling here again (your favourite!).
Yes! Another patch set (sent just before this one) targets ARM. There
is a nice ToDo in the cover letter: handle compat mode correctly. In
fact I sent a patch to libdw, so it supports it already but is
somewhat broken for compat mode. This is on my prefered ToDo list ;-)
>
>> +bool libdw__arch_set_initial_registers(Dwfl_Thread *thread, void *arg)
>> +{
>> + struct unwind_info *ui = arg;
>> + struct regs_dump *user_regs = &ui->sample->user_regs;
>> + Dwarf_Word dwarf_regs[PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX];
>
> Shouldn't this be PERF_REG_ARM64_MAX - 1?
Ah, well spotted! I will change although it shouldn't harm, right?
>
> Will
Thx for reviewing,
Jean
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists