[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4231522.iA1YhEv1iL@wuerfel>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 20:21:48 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.samsung@...il.com>,
Linux DeviceTree <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Samsung SOC <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Shaik Ameer Basha <shaik.ameer@...sung.com>,
Prathyush <prathyush.k@...sung.com>,
Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>,
"supash.ramaswamy" <supash.ramaswamy@...aro.org>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@...aro.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>,
Antonios Motakis <a.motakis@...tualopensystems.com>,
Varun Sethi <Varun.Sethi@...escale.com>,
sunil joshi <joshi@...sung.com>,
Rahul Sharma <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 00/31] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System MMU driver with DT
On Tuesday 06 May 2014 19:59:05 Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote:
> > This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here
> > doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new versions
> > very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and
> > again is quite a hard job.
> >
> > If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of
> > above patches,
> > which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't depend on
> > DT bindings are already tested, I hope merging these subset of patches may help
> > in reducing the rework and review effort every time.
> >
> > Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver
> > can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind.
>
> Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When
> Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the
> dt-independend parts.
Sounds good to me.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists