[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140506195704.GA5619@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 21:57:04 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tom Herbert <therbert@...gle.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>, josh@...htriplett.org,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] net, diet: Make TCP metrics optional
> Can this at least be done without the combinatorial explosion in
> number of configurations? As Yuchung pointed out these patches
> introduce at least one unresolved configuration dependency. CONFIG_SMP
> works quite well since with a single parameter we can enable/disable a
> whole bunch of functionality in bulk, and it's quite clear that new
> development cannot break smp or non-smp configurations. Maybe you want
> something similar like CONFIG_NETWORK_SMALL?
Yes I've considered this. I'm not sure SMP is good enough though,
at some point we'll get tiny dual core systems.
>From the 0/0:
>>>
Right now I'm using own Kconfigs for every removed features. I realize
this somewhat increases the compile test matrix. It would be possible
to hide some of the options and select them using higher level
configurations like the ones listed above. I haven't done this
in this version.
<<<
-Andi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists