linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/24] net, diet: Make TCP metrics optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 06 May 2014 17:11:17 -0400 (EDT)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	josh@...htriplett.org
Cc:	xiyou.wangcong@...il.com, andi@...stfloor.org,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] net, diet: Make TCP metrics optional

From: josh@...htriplett.org
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 14:08:15 -0700

> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:44:10PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
>> Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 11:33:11 -0700
>> 
>> > So why bothers 3.15+ Linux kernel? Why not use an old kernel e.g. 2.4.x?
>> > 2.4.x kernel doesn't have so many new features you want to get rid of here.
>> 
>> +1
> 
> You've got to be kidding.  Using 2.4 for a new network-connected device,
> today?  With all of its potential security holes that nobody is paying
> attention to?  Easier to fork 3.15 and trim it down than to do *that*.
> And there *are* a huge number of useful features in 3.15+, not least of
> which drivers for current hardware.

So you're saying that the 2.4.x -stable maintainer did a shitty job and
his work is worthless?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/