[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140506030328.GK2382@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 05:03:28 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/24] net, diet: Make GRO offload optional
On Mon, May 05, 2014 at 11:01:18PM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
> Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 15:26:02 -0700
>
> > It's not needed on small systems.
>
> On the contrary, I would expect the performance gains from
> batching the packet receive path to be even larger on slow
> small computers.
Ok I will rephrase it. The issue is really only the text size.
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists