linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <53697464.6010806@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 06 May 2014 19:46:44 -0400
From:	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
CC:	Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, morten.rasmussen@....com,
	mingo@...nel.org, george.mccollister@...il.com,
	ktkhai@...allels.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC/TEST] sched: make sync affine wakeups work

On 05/06/2014 04:39 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:19:21PM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> On 05/06/2014 07:54 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:19:47AM -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
>>>> As an aside, it also looks like SD_BALANCE_WAKE is set on all domains
>                                      ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

>> static inline int sd_local_flags(int level)
>> {
>>         if (sched_domains_numa_distance[level] > RECLAIM_DISTANCE)
>>                 return 0;
>>
>>         return SD_BALANCE_EXEC | SD_BALANCE_FORK | SD_WAKE_AFFINE;
>> }
> 
> No BALANCE_WAKE there

Yeah you're right, I typoed in my earlier email and didn't pick
up on it later.  Doh.

-- 
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/