[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140506031127.GM2382@two.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 05:11:27 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: andi@...stfloor.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tom.zanussi@...ux.intel.com,
ak@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/24] net, diet: Make rtnetlink optional
> The moment one of these "small" systems, or whatever you want to call
> it, tries to use any feature added to device configuration in the last
> 20 years ioctl doesn't cut it.
They will simply not use all that complexity ever, 400k is simply prohibitive
with 2MB.
If you want to keep netlink what would you remove instead?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists