[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <53698380.1060006@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 May 2014 17:51:12 -0700
From: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Josh Cartwright <joshc@...eaurora.org>,
Courtney Cavin <courtney.cavin@...ymobile.com>
CC: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 1/3] devicetree: set bus type same as parent
From: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...ymobile.com>
This is a somewhat scary patch since it touches a path that is central to
device creation based on the device tree. It should not be applied without
careful consideration.
I am not sure if this patch is a good idea, even if it does not break
anything.
An issue with the path of SPMI nodes under /sys/bus/... was reported in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/23/312. The symptom is that two different
grandchild nodes of the spmi with the same node-name@...t-address will
result in attempting to create duplicate links at
/sys/bus/platform/devices/unit-address.node-name. It turns out that the
specific example provided might not be an expected configuration for
current hardware, but the reported trap remains an issue.
The common pattern exposed is a driver probe function calling
of_platform_populate() to create child devices. As the reporting
email noted, the devices are created with dev.bus set to
platform_bus_type. Thus all devices created via this pattern will
result in a link in /sys/bus/platform/devices/, with the risk that
a name collision will occur.
This patch reduces the scope of possible name collisions to devices
on the same bus type. This is still not ideal, because a legal
device tree source file can result in run time errors. In the case
of SPMI nodes, the collisions will occur in /bus/spmi/devices/.
I have not investigated whether other drivers would be negatively impacted
by this change - there are 26 drivers in tree that call of_platform_populate().
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@...ymobile.com>
---
drivers/of/platform.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: b/drivers/of/platform.c
===================================================================
--- a/drivers/of/platform.c
+++ b/drivers/of/platform.c
@@ -217,7 +217,10 @@ static struct platform_device *of_platfo
dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask = DMA_BIT_MASK(32);
if (!dev->dev.dma_mask)
dev->dev.dma_mask = &dev->dev.coherent_dma_mask;
- dev->dev.bus = &platform_bus_type;
+ if (parent && parent->bus)
+ dev->dev.bus = parent->bus;
+ else
+ dev->dev.bus = &platform_bus_type;
dev->dev.platform_data = platform_data;
/* We do not fill the DMA ops for platform devices by default.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists