[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5369E8C6.1070409@atmel.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:03:18 +0200
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Bryan Evenson <bevenson@...inkcorp.com>,
Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
"rtc-linux@...glegroups.com" <rtc-linux@...glegroups.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Andrew Victor <linux@...im.org.za>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: rtc-at91rm9200: fix infinite wait for ACKUPD irq
On 06/05/2014 23:10, Alexandre Belloni :
> Hi,
>
> On 06/05/2014 at 19:06:56 +0000, Bryan Evenson wrote :
>>
>> I'd assume this patch would be backported to the longterm releases?
>>
>
> If by longterm, you mean the linux4sam tree, 3.10 branch, it is up to
> Nicolas to take it. I believe it will be pretty easy to convince him ;)
Absolutely, it is always easy to convince me with:
- good commit message
- script to reproduce the issue
- follow-up of the patch plus testing
- dialogue between skilled kernel developers
So, yes, I will "ack" the patch and immediately integrate it in our
linux4sam 3.10 branch.
On the other hand, I let Boris add the "stable" tag to his original patch.
Thanks to all of you for this fix. Bye,
--
Nicolas Ferre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists