lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpomkrR715dhyZZQwu_-S6LHsYBOj9YsX9HR6PCMKkMdrVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 14:02:24 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Cc:	Beniamino Galvani <b.galvani@...il.com>, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pwm: spear: fix check on pwmchip_add() return value

On 7 May 2014 13:54, Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com> wrote:
> So the current code would run clk_unprepare() on success, but not on
> failure. Does that cause any harm?

Yeah, that would make the device unusable  as clk_enable will always fail.

> Is the device still usable after this?

Yes, this will fix the bug.

> I'm asking because I'm not sure if this is linux-next material
> or should be a fix for 3.15 (and possibly backported to stable).

IMO, it should be sent for stable: v3.8+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ