[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5369F020.2040706@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 10:34:40 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] KVM: emulate: avoid repeated calls to do_insn_fetch_bytes
Il 07/05/2014 06:21, Bandan Das ha scritto:
>> > + if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINNUE)
>> > + goto done;
>> > + }
>> > +
>> > while (size--) {
>> > - if (unlikely(ctxt->_eip == fc->end)) {
>> > - rc = do_insn_fetch_bytes(ctxt);
>> > - if (rc != X86EMUL_CONTINUE)
>> > - return rc;
>> > - }
>> > *dest++ = *src++;
>> > ctxt->_eip++;
>> > continue;
>> > @@ -4273,7 +4282,7 @@ int x86_decode_insn(struct x86_emulate_ctxt *ctxt, void *insn, int insn_len)
>> > if (insn_len > 0)
>> > memcpy(ctxt->fetch.data, insn, insn_len);
>> > else {
>> > - rc = do_insn_fetch_bytes(ctxt);
>> > + rc = do_insn_fetch_bytes(ctxt, 1);
> Is this saying that if the cache is full, then we fetch one more byte ?
>
No, it is saying that if the instruction is being executed for the first
time (we can execute it multiple times if we reenter a repeated
instruction after a userspace exit) we try to get at least one byte from
RIP. Most of the time, do_insn_fetch_bytes will fetch 15 bytes which
are the maximum length of an instruction.
Passing op_size == 1 matches this change in do_insn_fetch_bytes:
- if (unlikely(size == 0))
+ if (unlikely(size < op_size))
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists