[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5369F0D6.3080503@st.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 10:37:42 +0200
From: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@...com>
To: Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, <mturquette@...aro.org>
Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: clk-divider: Fix infinite loop for table divider
Hi Fabio,
On 05/06/2014 10:26 PM, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> From: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
>
> Since commit e7489693b3 (clk: divider: Optimize clk_divider_bestdiv loop) we
> notice a system hang on mx6qboard.
>
> The cause for the hang is well explained by Sascha Hauer [1]:
>
> "This cannot work. _round_up_table is implemented like this:
>
> static int _round_up_table(const struct clk_div_table *table, int div)
> {
> const struct clk_div_table *clkt;
> int up = _get_table_maxdiv(table);
>
> for (clkt = table; clkt->div; clkt++) {
> if (clkt->div == div)
> return clkt->div;
> ...
> }
> ...
> }
>
> Here when a table entry matches the input div this function will return
> exactly the input div. This means _next_div() will always return the
> same value and clk_divider_bestdiv() has an infinite loop:
>
> for (i = 1; i <= maxdiv; i = _next_div(divider, i)) {
> ...
> }
> "
> [1] http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=139940658726253&w=2
>
> Remove the 'return _round_up_table' so that the system can work normally again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@...escale.com>
> ---
> drivers/clk/clk-divider.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> index b3c8396..fc3e344 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
> @@ -246,8 +246,6 @@ static int _next_div(struct clk_divider *divider, int div)
>
> if (divider->flags & CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO)
> return __roundup_pow_of_two(div);
> - if (divider->table)
> - return _round_up_table(divider->table, div);
Couldn't we initialize "up" variable to INT_MAX in _round_up_table() as
I just proposed in mail thread reporting the regression?
See http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=139945172905130&w=2
Regards,
Maxime
>
> return div;
> }
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists