linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 09:15:23 -0400
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] workqueue: async worker destruction

On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:30:39PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> On 04/27/2014 12:08 PM, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> 
> >  
> >  	spin_unlock_irq(&pool->lock);
> > +
> > +	wait_event_cmd(pool->workers_unbound,
> > +		       idr_is_empty(&pool->worker_idr),
> > +		       mutex_unlock(&pool->manager_mutex),
> > +		       mutex_lock(&pool->manager_mutex));
> > +
> 
> 
> How about I wrap it as wait_event_mutex()?
> (like wait_event_lock_irq() in kernel and pthread_cond_wait() in userspace)

waitq tends to be trickier to get right.  Can you please give
completion a shot?  completion is pretty convenient for (its only
purpose after all) this sort of one-shot synchronizations.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/