[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140507142321.GA2844@laptop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 16:23:21 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>,
Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando_b1@....ntt.co.jp>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4 v2] nohz: Fix idle/iowait counts going backwards
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 03:41:33PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> With this change, "iowait-ness" of every idle period is decided
> at the moment it starts:
> if this CPU's run-queue had tasks waiting on I/O, then this idle
> period's duration will be added to iowait_sleeptime.
>
> This fixes the bug where iowait and/or idle counts could go backwards,
> but iowait accounting is not precise (it can show more iowait
> that there really is).
>
NAK on this, the thing going backwards is a symptom of the bug, not an
actual bug itself.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists