[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4Pn2VUEnQ8FyOaBffqfUiHt6ocLEEvyaJrSKmTjaNp_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 23:52:59 +0900
From: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To: Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@...il.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>,
Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: remove global tb_lock by using lock-free CAS
>> Most popular use of zram is the in-memory swap for small embedded system
>> so I don't want to increase memory footprint without good reason although
>> it makes synthetic benchmark. Alhought it's 1M for 1G, it isn't small if we
>> consider compression ratio and real free memory after boot
We can use bit spin lock and this would not increase memory footprint for 32 bit
platform.
Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists