lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAmzW4Pn2VUEnQ8FyOaBffqfUiHt6ocLEEvyaJrSKmTjaNp_wQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 23:52:59 +0900
From:	Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
To:	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang.kh@...il.com>
Cc:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Weijie Yang <weijie.yang@...sung.com>,
	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr@...com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Seth Jennings <sjennings@...iantweb.net>,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
	Bob Liu <bob.liu@...cle.com>,
	Dan Streetman <ddstreet@...e.org>,
	Heesub Shin <heesub.shin@...sung.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zram: remove global tb_lock by using lock-free CAS

>> Most popular use of zram is the in-memory swap for small embedded system
>> so I don't want to increase memory footprint without good reason although
>> it makes synthetic benchmark. Alhought it's 1M for 1G, it isn't small if we
>> consider compression ratio and real free memory after boot

We can use bit spin lock and this would not increase memory footprint for 32 bit
platform.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ