[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536A5412.5000403@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 07 May 2014 17:41:06 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Abel Gordon <abel@...atoscale.com>
CC: Hu Yaohui <loki2441@...il.com>, Bandan Das <bsd@...hat.com>,
kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Muli Ben-Yehuda <muli@...atoscale.com>
Subject: Re: KVM Nested L2 guest startup problems
Il 07/05/2014 17:30, Abel Gordon ha scritto:
> > ... which we already do. The only secondary execution controls we allow are
> > APIC page, unrestricted guest, WBINVD exits, and of course EPT.
>
> But we don't verify if L1 tries to enable the feature for L1 (even if
> it's not exposed)... Or do we ?
Yes, we do:
if (!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->cpu_based_vm_exec_control,
nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_low, nested_vmx_procbased_ctls_high) ||
!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control,
nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low, nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high) ||
!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->pin_based_vm_exec_control,
nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_low, nested_vmx_pinbased_ctls_high) ||
!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_exit_controls,
nested_vmx_exit_ctls_low, nested_vmx_exit_ctls_high) ||
!vmx_control_verify(vmcs12->vm_entry_controls,
nested_vmx_entry_ctls_low, nested_vmx_entry_ctls_high))
{
nested_vmx_failValid(vcpu, VMXERR_ENTRY_INVALID_CONTROL_FIELD);
return 1;
}
Paolo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists