[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140507154231.GB14926@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 17:42:31 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
ak@...ux.intel.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] x86, nmi: Add better NMI stats to /proc/interrupts
and show handlers
* Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
> The main reason for this patch is because I have a hard time knowing
> what NMI handlers are registered on the system when debugging NMI issues.
>
> This info is provided in /proc/interrupts for interrupt handlers, so I
> added support for NMI stuff too. As a bonus it provides stat breakdowns
> much like the interrupts.
>
> The only ugly issue is how to label NMI subtypes using only 3 letters
> and still make it obvious it is part of the NMI. Adding a /proc/nmi
> seemed overkill, so I choose to indent things by one space. Sample
> output is below:
>
> [root@...p71-248 ~]# cat /proc/interrupts
> CPU0 CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
> 0: 29 0 0 0 IR-IO-APIC-edge timer
> <snip>
> NMI: 20 774 10986 4227 Non-maskable interrupts
> LOC: 21 775 10987 4228 Local PMI, arch_bt
> EXT: 0 0 0 0 External plat
> UNK: 0 0 0 0 Unknown
> SWA: 0 0 0 0 Swallowed
> LOC: 30374 24749 20795 15095 Local timer interrupts
> SPU: 0 0 0 0 Spurious interrupts
> PMI: 20 774 10986 4227 Performance monitoring interrupts
> <snip>
Looks pretty useful!
The lost vertical alignment of the counts is a problem though IMHO.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists