linux-kernel - Re: IPMI misbehaving on ARM defconfigs, was [Re: stable boot: 18 pass, 4 fail (v3.10.39)]

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 7 May 2014 13:31:33 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To:	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	Corey Minyard <minyard@....org>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>,
	Ezequiel Garcia <ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com>,
	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
	kernel-build-reports@...ts.linaro.org,
	Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...glemail.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	openipmi-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: IPMI misbehaving on ARM defconfigs, was [Re: stable boot: 18
 pass, 4 fail (v3.10.39)]

On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 1:28 PM, Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net> wrote:
[...]

> On a broader topic, if we have users in the field running v3.10.y on ARM
> systems, then I think it's worth backporting the defconfig changes to
> boot-test those systems.

Yeah, especially since v3.10 is LTS, it's probably worth doing, though
not sure if anyone using LTS cares about multi_v7_defconfig.

> I'll see if I can generate a list of patches.

Thanks.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/