[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140507212224.9085.qmail@ns.horizon.com>
Date: 7 May 2014 17:22:24 -0400
From: "George Spelvin" <linux@...izon.com>
To: cl@...ux.com, iamjoonsoo.kim@....com
Cc: linux@...izon.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] slab: move up code to get kmem_cache_node in free_block()
Seeing this patch made me think of a larger cleanup.
Would this be worth adding to the series?
(I incorporated your patch, as I couldn't decide whether
to write mine before or after; I assume it's no problem
to separate whichever way you want to order it.)
Commit comment something like:
Subject: Let clear_obj_pfmemalloc return the modified pointer
All callers fetch it immediately after, so just return the written
value for convenience.
Signed-off-by: George Spelvin <linux@...izon.com>
---
mm/slab.c | 24 ++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/slab.c b/mm/slab.c
index 388cb1ae6f..7fdc8df104 100644
--- a/mm/slab.c
+++ b/mm/slab.c
@@ -215,9 +215,9 @@ static inline void set_obj_pfmemalloc(void **objp)
return;
}
-static inline void clear_obj_pfmemalloc(void **objp)
+static inline void *clear_obj_pfmemalloc(void **objp)
{
- *objp = (void *)((unsigned long)*objp & ~SLAB_OBJ_PFMEMALLOC);
+ return *objp = (void *)((unsigned long)*objp & ~SLAB_OBJ_PFMEMALLOC);
}
/*
@@ -809,10 +809,8 @@ static void *__ac_get_obj(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct array_cache *ac,
if (unlikely(is_obj_pfmemalloc(objp))) {
struct kmem_cache_node *n;
- if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(flags)) {
- clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
- return objp;
- }
+ if (gfp_pfmemalloc_allowed(flags))
+ return clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
/* The caller cannot use PFMEMALLOC objects, find another one */
for (i = 0; i < ac->avail; i++) {
@@ -833,9 +831,8 @@ static void *__ac_get_obj(struct kmem_cache *cachep, struct array_cache *ac,
if (!list_empty(&n->slabs_free) && force_refill) {
struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
ClearPageSlabPfmemalloc(page);
- clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
recheck_pfmemalloc_active(cachep, ac);
- return objp;
+ return clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objp);
}
/* No !PFMEMALLOC objects available */
@@ -3362,17 +3359,12 @@ static void free_block(struct kmem_cache *cachep, void **objpp, int nr_objects,
int node)
{
int i;
- struct kmem_cache_node *n;
+ struct kmem_cache_node *n = cachep->node[node];
for (i = 0; i < nr_objects; i++) {
- void *objp;
- struct page *page;
-
- clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objpp[i]);
- objp = objpp[i];
+ void *objp = clear_obj_pfmemalloc(&objpp[i]);
+ struct page *page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
- page = virt_to_head_page(objp);
- n = cachep->node[node];
list_del(&page->lru);
check_spinlock_acquired_node(cachep, node);
slab_put_obj(cachep, page, objp, node);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists