[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20140507144248.cf3d5e7411186e2cd616ded8@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 14:42:48 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Raghavendra Ganiga <ravi23ganiga@...il.com>
Cc: a.zummo@...ertech.it, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc: add support for maxim dallas rtc ds1343 and ds1344
On Wed, 7 May 2014 00:33:56 +0530 Raghavendra Ganiga <ravi23ganiga@...il.com> wrote:
> This is a patch to add support for
> maxim dallas rtc ds1343 and ds1344
>
> ...
>
> +static int ds1343_ioctl(struct device *dev, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg)
> +{
> + switch (cmd) {
> +#ifdef RTC_SET_CHARGE
> + case RTC_SET_CHARGE:
> + {
> + int val;
> +
> + if (copy_from_user(&val, (int __user *)arg, sizeof(int)))
> + return -EFAULT;
> +
> + return regmap_write(priv->map, DS1343_TRICKLE_REG, val);
> + }
> + break;
> +#endif
> + }
Why is RTC_SET_CHARGE defined only for m32r? It seems pretty generic?
> + return -ENOIOCTLCMD;
> +}
It's possible that this should be -ENOTTY. I always forget the rule,
but Alan never forgets anything ;)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists