| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20140508080234.GO8607@moon>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 12:02:34 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@...ne.edu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: perf_fuzzer crash on pentium 4
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:49:30AM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > Don, Vince, could you please give the patch a run? I've only compile tested
> > it obviously since I've no real p4 hw. And the patch itself is a bit ugly
> > but should bring the light if we're still having problems in events
> > scheduling.
>
> Drop it, won't work.
Updated.
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++--------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)
Index: linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.git.orig/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
+++ linux-2.6.git/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_p4.c
@@ -1063,23 +1063,23 @@ static int p4_pmu_handle_irq(struct pt_r
* swap thread specific fields according to a thread
* we are going to run on
*/
-static void p4_pmu_swap_config_ts(struct hw_perf_event *hwc, int cpu)
+static u64 p4_pmu_swap_config_ts(u64 config, int cpu)
{
u32 escr, cccr;
/*
* we either lucky and continue on same cpu or no HT support
*/
- if (!p4_should_swap_ts(hwc->config, cpu))
- return;
+ if (!p4_should_swap_ts(config, cpu))
+ return config;
/*
* the event is migrated from an another logical
* cpu, so we need to swap thread specific flags
*/
- escr = p4_config_unpack_escr(hwc->config);
- cccr = p4_config_unpack_cccr(hwc->config);
+ escr = p4_config_unpack_escr(config);
+ cccr = p4_config_unpack_cccr(config);
if (p4_ht_thread(cpu)) {
cccr &= ~P4_CCCR_OVF_PMI_T0;
@@ -1092,9 +1092,9 @@ static void p4_pmu_swap_config_ts(struct
escr &= ~P4_ESCR_T0_USR;
escr |= P4_ESCR_T1_USR;
}
- hwc->config = p4_config_pack_escr(escr);
- hwc->config |= p4_config_pack_cccr(cccr);
- hwc->config |= P4_CONFIG_HT;
+ config = p4_config_pack_escr(escr);
+ config |= p4_config_pack_cccr(cccr);
+ config |= P4_CONFIG_HT;
} else {
cccr &= ~P4_CCCR_OVF_PMI_T1;
cccr |= P4_CCCR_OVF_PMI_T0;
@@ -1106,10 +1106,12 @@ static void p4_pmu_swap_config_ts(struct
escr &= ~P4_ESCR_T1_USR;
escr |= P4_ESCR_T0_USR;
}
- hwc->config = p4_config_pack_escr(escr);
- hwc->config |= p4_config_pack_cccr(cccr);
- hwc->config &= ~P4_CONFIG_HT;
+ config = p4_config_pack_escr(escr);
+ config |= p4_config_pack_cccr(cccr);
+ config &= ~P4_CONFIG_HT;
}
+
+ return config;
}
/*
@@ -1208,9 +1210,10 @@ static int p4_pmu_schedule_events(struct
unsigned long used_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(X86_PMC_IDX_MAX)];
unsigned long escr_mask[BITS_TO_LONGS(P4_ESCR_MSR_TABLE_SIZE)];
int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ u64 config[X86_PMC_IDX_MAX];
struct hw_perf_event *hwc;
struct p4_event_bind *bind;
- unsigned int i, thread, num;
+ unsigned int i, thread;
int cntr_idx, escr_idx;
u64 config_alias;
int pass;
@@ -1218,12 +1221,13 @@ static int p4_pmu_schedule_events(struct
bitmap_zero(used_mask, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX);
bitmap_zero(escr_mask, P4_ESCR_MSR_TABLE_SIZE);
- for (i = 0, num = n; i < n; i++, num--) {
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
hwc = &cpuc->event_list[i]->hw;
thread = p4_ht_thread(cpu);
pass = 0;
+ config[i] = hwc->config;
again:
/*
* It's possible to hit a circular lock
@@ -1233,12 +1237,12 @@ again:
if (pass > 2)
goto done;
- bind = p4_config_get_bind(hwc->config);
+ bind = p4_config_get_bind(config[i]);
escr_idx = p4_get_escr_idx(bind->escr_msr[thread]);
if (unlikely(escr_idx == -1))
goto done;
- if (hwc->idx != -1 && !p4_should_swap_ts(hwc->config, cpu)) {
+ if (hwc->idx != -1 && !p4_should_swap_ts(config[i], cpu)) {
cntr_idx = hwc->idx;
if (assign)
assign[i] = hwc->idx;
@@ -1250,32 +1254,15 @@ again:
/*
* Check whether an event alias is still available.
*/
- config_alias = p4_get_alias_event(hwc->config);
+ config_alias = p4_get_alias_event(config[i]);
if (!config_alias)
goto done;
- hwc->config = config_alias;
+ config[i] = config_alias;
pass++;
goto again;
}
- /*
- * Perf does test runs to see if a whole group can be assigned
- * together succesfully. There can be multiple rounds of this.
- * Unfortunately, p4_pmu_swap_config_ts touches the hwc->config
- * bits, such that the next round of group assignments will
- * cause the above p4_should_swap_ts to pass instead of fail.
- * This leads to counters exclusive to thread0 being used by
- * thread1.
- *
- * Solve this with a cheap hack, reset the idx back to -1 to
- * force a new lookup (p4_next_cntr) to get the right counter
- * for the right thread.
- *
- * This probably doesn't comply with the general spirit of how
- * perf wants to work, but P4 is special. :-(
- */
- if (p4_should_swap_ts(hwc->config, cpu))
- hwc->idx = -1;
- p4_pmu_swap_config_ts(hwc, cpu);
+
+ config[i] = p4_pmu_swap_config_ts(config[i], cpu);
if (assign)
assign[i] = cntr_idx;
reserve:
@@ -1284,7 +1271,13 @@ reserve:
}
done:
- return num ? -EINVAL : 0;
+ if (i == n) {
+ for (i = 0; i < n; i++)
+ cpuc->event_list[i]->hw.config = config[i];
+ return 0;
+ }
+
+ return -EINVAL;
}
PMU_FORMAT_ATTR(cccr, "config:0-31" );
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists