[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140508102514.GA6942@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 11:25:14 +0100
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
Cc: Larry Bassel <larry.bassel@...aro.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] arm64: enable context tracking
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:49:04AM +0100, Kevin Hilman wrote:
> Hi Will,
Hello Kevin,
> Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com> writes:
> > On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 12:32:29AM +0100, Larry Bassel wrote:
> >> Make calls to ct_user_enter when the kernel is exited
> >> and ct_user_exit when the kernel is entered (in el0_da,
> >> el0_ia, el0_svc, el0_irq).
> >
> > Why only these entry points? I can reschedule after any exception from EL0,
> > so I'd expect all exceptions from userspace to need annotating, no?
>
> In my initial approach to this, you might recall (though it was over a
> year ago now) was to just instrument kernel_enter rather than sprinkle
> the instrumentaion in cl0_*. However, your concern at the time was that
> since it was before debugging was enabled it would complicate debugging
> these paths.
>
> Any chance you have any other suggestion on how we might do this in
> kernel_entry rather than sprinkling them all over cl0_*? or is the
> sprinkling the only good way to handle this.
Unfortunately, different exceptions do subtly different things before
invoking the main handler. For example:
- Stashing the far
- Enabling IRQs
- Enabling debug
- All the stuff on the syscall path
so putting the logic in kernel_entry isn't really do-able, unfortunately.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists