[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140508113506.GF26890@mwanda>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 14:35:06 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@....fi>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: lirc: Fix sparse warnings
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 02:13:17PM +0300, Tuomas Tynkkynen wrote:
> Fix sparse warnings by adding __user and __iomem annotations where
> necessary and removing certain unnecessary casts. While at it,
> also use u32 in place of __u32.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tuomas Tynkkynen <tuomas.tynkkynen@....fi>
Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Btw, don't resend this (someone will have to fix it in a later patch)
but I notice that these IOCTLs are not implemented consistently. Even
outside of staging we have this problem. For example lirc_rx51_ioctl().
In this function the user gets a u32.
> case LIRC_GET_FEATURES:
> - result = put_user(features, (__u32 *) arg);
> + result = put_user(features, uptr);
> if (result)
> return result;
> break;
But here they get a long.
> case LIRC_GET_FEATURES:
> - result = put_user(features, (unsigned long *) arg);
> + result = put_user(features, uptr);
> break;
My feeling it should always be u32 so we don't have to write a
compatability layer for 32 bit applications on a 64 bit kernel.
regards,
dan carpenter
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists