[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140508153722.GO32718@rric.localhost>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 17:37:22 +0200
From: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
To: Suravee Suthikulanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>
Cc: bhelgaas@...gle.com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Aravind Gopalakrishnan <Aravind.Gopalakrishnan@....com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>,
Daniel J Blueman <daniel@...ascale.com>,
Andreas Herrmann <herrmann.der.user@...glemail.com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/3] x86/PCI: Fix PCI root numa_node info on AMD
family15h
On 08.05.14 10:21:07, Suravee Suthikulanit wrote:
> The reason I put it all these comments here is because it took us a while to
> discuss what to do with this file going forward. There were some confusions.
> Therefore, I just want to document it here.
>
> Also, the check for (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 0x11) was needed because it should
> not be done for family15h.
Yes, the only functional change of this patch is adding the bridge and
the family check, right? Basically:
+ { 0, 0x18, PCI_VENDOR_ID_AMD, 0x1600 },
and
+ /*
+ * The following code is only supported until Fam11h.
+ * Newer processors will depend on ACPI MCFG table instead.
+ */
+ if (boot_cpu_data.x86 > 0x11)
+ return 0;
+
This patch should stripped down to only those changes with a
split. And maybe this should be added to linux-stable?
All other rework is a different story... Can be done on top of this,
though I would drop it.
-Robert
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists