[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140508172243.GC6095@piout.net>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 19:22:43 +0200
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Josh Wu <josh.wu@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] iio:adc: at91 requires the input subsystem
Hi,
On 08/05/2014 at 16:56:24 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> Building the at91 adc driver with CONFIG_INPUT disabled results in this
> build error:
>
> ERROR: "input_event" [drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "input_unregister_device" [drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "input_free_device" [drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "input_register_device" [drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "input_set_abs_params" [drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.ko] undefined!
> ERROR: "input_allocate_device" [drivers/iio/adc/at91_adc.ko] undefined!
>
> To make sure we can build random configurations, this turns on CONFIG_INPUT
> whenever CONFIG_AT91_ADC is enabled.
>
I'm wondering wether we should make part of the driver compile only if
CONFIG_INPUT is defined. Maybe some user will want to use the ADC and
not have any input on their board.
What do you think ?
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists