[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1399574859-11714-1-git-send-email-minyard@acm.org>
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 13:47:39 -0500
From: minyard@....org
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
Subject: [PATCH] sched: Initialize rq->age_stamp on processor start
From: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
If the sched_clock time starts at a large value, the kernel will spin
in sched_avg_update for a long time while rq->age_stamp catches up
with rq->clock.
The comment in kernel/sched/clock.c says that there is no strict promise
that it starts at zero. So initialize rq->age_stamp when a cpu starts up
to avoid this.
I was seeing long delays on a simulator that didn't start the clock at
zero. This might also be an issue on reboots on processors that don't
re-initialize the timer to zero on reset, and when using kexec.
Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@...sta.com>
---
kernel/sched/core.c | 10 ++++++++++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
index 268a45e..80725c9 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/core.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
@@ -5039,11 +5039,20 @@ static struct notifier_block migration_notifier = {
.priority = CPU_PRI_MIGRATION,
};
+static void __cpuinit set_cpu_rq_start_time(void)
+{
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
+ rq->age_stamp = sched_clock_cpu(cpu);
+}
+
static int sched_cpu_active(struct notifier_block *nfb,
unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
{
switch (action & ~CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) {
case CPU_STARTING:
+ set_cpu_rq_start_time();
+ /* fall through */
case CPU_DOWN_FAILED:
set_cpu_active((long)hcpu, true);
return NOTIFY_OK;
@@ -6919,6 +6928,7 @@ void __init sched_init(void)
if (cpu_isolated_map == NULL)
zalloc_cpumask_var(&cpu_isolated_map, GFP_NOWAIT);
idle_thread_set_boot_cpu();
+ set_cpu_rq_start_time();
#endif
init_sched_fair_class();
--
1.8.3.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists