[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <536BE3A7.8030402@free-electrons.com>
Date: Thu, 08 May 2014 22:05:59 +0200
From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
To: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
CC: Emilio López <emilio@...pez.com.ar>,
Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Shuge <shuge@...winnertech.com>, kevin@...winnertech.com,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dev@...ux-sunxi.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] reset: sunxi: allow MFD subdevices probe
On 08/05/2014 05:07, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 07:25:49PM +0200, Boris BREZILLON wrote:
>> The current implementation uses sunxi_reset_init function for both early
>> init and platform device probe.
>>
>> The sunxi_reset_init function uses DT to retrieve device resources, which
>> will be an issue if reset controllers are registered from an MFD device
>> that define resources from mfd_cell definition.
>>
>> Moreover, we can make of devm functions when we're in the probe context.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++++---
>> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> index 695bd34..1b5fea6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> +++ b/drivers/reset/reset-sunxi.c
>> @@ -145,7 +145,24 @@ MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, sunxi_reset_dt_ids);
>>
>> static int sunxi_reset_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> {
>> - return sunxi_reset_init(pdev->dev.of_node);
>> + struct sunxi_reset_data *data;
>> + struct resource *res;
>> +
>> + data = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);
>> + if (!data)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> + data->membase = devm_request_and_ioremap(&pdev->dev, res);
>> + if (!data->membase)
>> + return -ENOMEM;
> You'd probably be better off using devm_ioremap_resource so that you
> get a meaningful error code.
Oh, I missed this one. I'll fix it for the next version.
> Apart from this, you have my
> Acked-by: Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>
>
> Thanks!
> Maxime
>
--
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists