linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+55aFy9B=OcqfniMiq+EhDa_rzc0-owcmbUck1FmBOU+Q-Dvw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 May 2014 16:13:00 -0700
From:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	xfs@....sgi.com
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] xfs: fixes for 3.15-rc5

On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 2:12 PM, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, will GPG signing these pull requests cause you problems?

Nope. But I won't be checking email signatures. GPG email signing is
so badly done that afaik only one or two email clients support it.

> I've
> been signing everything "official" I send as the XFS maintainer
> (e.g. notifications of tree updates) and I figured that pull
> requests are about as "official" as it gets. The tag is signed, so
> I'm not particularly worried either way...

.. what tag? You point me at

>   git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-fixes-for-3.15-rc5

and that is definitely not a tag.

Did you *mean* to point me at refs/tags/xfs-for-linus-3.15-rc5, perhaps?

I've not pulled due to the ambiguity of the pull request.

           Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/