linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] acpi_processor: do not mark present at boot but not onlined CPU as onlined

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20140508060935.GA31184@gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 8 May 2014 08:09:35 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc:	Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	x86@...nel.org, bp@...e.de, paul.gortmaker@...driver.com,
	JBeulich@...e.com, prarit@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
	toshi.kani@...com, riel@...hat.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, lenb@...nel.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/4] acpi_processor: do not mark present at boot but
 not onlined CPU as onlined


* Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net> wrote:

> On Monday, May 05, 2014 10:49:49 PM Igor Mammedov wrote:
> > acpi_processor_add() assumes that present at boot CPUs
> > are always onlined, it is not so if a CPU failed to become
> > onlined. As result acpi_processor_add() will mark such CPU
> > device as onlined in sysfs and following attempts to
> > online/offline it using /sys/device/system/cpu/cpuX/online
> > attribute will fail.
> > 
> > Do not poke into device internals in acpi_processor_add()
> > and touch "struct device { .offline }" attribute, since
> > for CPUs onlined at boot it's set by:
> >   topology_init() -> arch_register_cpu() -> register_cpu()
> > before ACPI device tree is parsed, and for hotplugged
> > CPUs it's set when userspace onlines CPU via sysfs.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@...hat.com>
> > Acked-by: Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>
> 
> Would there be a problem if I applied this separately from the rest 
> of the series?

If you push the fix upstream for v3.15 then it would be fine and I 
could base the other patches on top of your (soon to be upstream) 
commit.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/