[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZV647fx5j+a8ds_1eHffwnUijvX7qodH7LgJtYkqvvEw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:06:45 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc: Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-OMAP <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
Bryan Wu <cooloney@...il.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>,
Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: gpio-backlight: Fix warning when the GPIO is
on a I2C chip
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 5:42 AM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:
> Linus Walleij,
> Is there any reason to keep these two functions such as
> gpiod_set_raw_value_cansleep() and gpiod_set_raw_value()?
Yes, the former can *not* be called from interrupt context,
and thus erroneous usage can be detected with runtime checks.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists