[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUrG6pR0_6VhL8P_=HDmVBQxa9kinRm=AFxddyHQFBNeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:08:37 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/20] arch,m68k: Fold atomic_ops
Hi Peter,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> +#ifdef CONFIG_RMW_INSNS
>
> -static inline void atomic_sub(int i, atomic_t *v)
> -{
> - __asm__ __volatile__("subl %1,%0" : "+m" (*v) : ASM_DI (i));
> -}
> +#define ATOMIC_OP(op, c_op, asm_op) \
> +static inline void atomic_##op(int i, atomic_t *v) \
> +{ \
> + __asm__ __volatile__(#asm_op "l %1,%0" : "+m" (*v) : ASM_DI (i));\
> +} \
> +#else
> +
> +#define ATOMIC_OP(op, c_op, asm_op) \
> +static inline void atomic_##op(int i, atomic_t *v) \
> +{ \
> + __asm__ __volatile__(#asm_op "l %1,%0" : "+m" (*v) : ASM_DI (i));\
> +} \
These two chunks are identical, so please move them out of the #ifdef.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists