[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKgNAkixNiLjJ4crqfNYFC+cWf7SiKFVUYa+3OZTWMkjZXZO4w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 May 2014 11:26:30 +0200
From: "Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)" <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...il.com>,
Dario Faggioli <raistlin@...ux.it>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Frédéric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Darren Hart <darren@...art.com>, johan.eker@...csson.com,
p.faure@...tech.ch, Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Claudio Scordino <claudio@...dence.eu.com>,
Michael Trimarchi <michael@...rulasolutions.com>,
Fabio Checconi <fchecconi@...il.com>,
Tommaso Cucinotta <tommaso.cucinotta@...up.it>,
nicola.manica@...i.unitn.it, luca.abeni@...tn.it,
Dhaval Giani <dhaval.giani@...il.com>, hgu1972@...il.com,
Paul McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Insop Song <insop.song@...il.com>, liming.wang@...driver.com,
jkacur@...hat.com, linux-man <linux-man@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched_{set,get}attr() manpage
Hi Peter,
On Fri, May 9, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:
> On Fri, May 09, 2014 at 10:23:22AM +0200, Michael Kerrisk (man-pages) wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> I'm working on this text. I see the following in kernel/sched/core.c:
>>
>> [[
>> static int __sched_setscheduler(struct task_struct *p,
>> const struct sched_attr *attr,
>> bool user)
>> {
>> ...
>>
>> int policy = attr->sched_policy;
>> ...
>> if (policy < 0) {
>> reset_on_fork = p->sched_reset_on_fork;
>> policy = oldpolicy = p->policy;
>> ]]
>>
>> What's a negative policy about? Is this something that should
>> be documented?
>
> That's for sched_setparam(), which internally passes policy = -1, it
> wasn't meant to be user visible, lemme double check that.
>
> sys_sched_setscheduler() -- explicit check for policy < 0
> sys_sched_setparam() -- explicitly passes policy=-1, not user visible
(Ahh -- I missed that piece in sys_sched_setparam())
> sys_sched_setattr() -- hmm, it looks like fail
Yep, I was seeing that there was no check in sched_setatr().
As I recently said, when it comes to writing a man page, show me a new
interface, and I'll show you a bug ;-).
Thanks for the clarification.
Acked-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Cheers,
Michael
> ---
> Subject: sched: Disallow sched_attr::sched_policy < 0
> From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Date: Fri May 9 10:49:03 CEST 2014
>
> The scheduler uses policy=-1 to preserve the current policy state to
> implement sys_sched_setparam(), this got exposed to userspace by
> accident through sys_sched_setattr(), cure this.
>
> Reported-by: Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/n/tip-b4kbwz2qh21xlngdzje00t55@git.kernel.org
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -3711,6 +3711,9 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(sched_setattr, pid_t, pi
> if (sched_copy_attr(uattr, &attr))
> return -EFAULT;
>
> + if (attr.sched_policy < 0)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> rcu_read_lock();
> retval = -ESRCH;
> p = find_process_by_pid(pid);
--
Michael Kerrisk
Linux man-pages maintainer; http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
Linux/UNIX System Programming Training: http://man7.org/training/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists